While geothermal is certainly worth pursuing as a carbon emission free energy source, it would need to develop to the point of completely displacing all coal and oil fired power plants before making a significance difference. Current annual carbon dioxide emissions are over 35 billion tons. Nine gigatons over 30 years will not have much impact considering over 1,000 billion tons (1000 gigatons) will have been released at the current annual rate.
Don`t miss out on GA Drilling https://planet-a.com/startups/ga-drilling/ They developed a new type of contactless drill that destroys hard rock using high-powered plasma pulses. Compared to legacy mechanical drilling, this contactless technology is key, as it overcomes the “tripping” challenge.
Their innovative technology is now able to exploit ultra-deep geothermal energy and could give us access to a permanent supply of renewable heating, cooling and power, provided anywhere, as well as providing a future-proof transition for skilled oil and gas workers, as existing infrastructure can be easily used. Their plasma driller leads to reducing drilling costs for geothermal projects, allowing the energy price to remain competitive even at deep depth.
All we do is run off looking to generate questionably new clean energy sources. Would be some day in dreamland when human western societies started to cut back on energy production. use less, create less, do with less. There is NO substitution for less,it's more stupid, more of a future on this planet and its children, more spendingt ime away from the Screaming Screens. This geothermal has potential for some good and plenty of potential for some bad effects on the climate. anything drilling into or near drinking water aquifers is a mistake. The planet already has a fresh water issue.
While geothermal is certainly worth pursuing as a carbon emission free energy source, it would need to develop to the point of completely displacing all coal and oil fired power plants before making a significance difference. Current annual carbon dioxide emissions are over 35 billion tons. Nine gigatons over 30 years will not have much impact considering over 1,000 billion tons (1000 gigatons) will have been released at the current annual rate.
Don`t miss out on GA Drilling https://planet-a.com/startups/ga-drilling/ They developed a new type of contactless drill that destroys hard rock using high-powered plasma pulses. Compared to legacy mechanical drilling, this contactless technology is key, as it overcomes the “tripping” challenge.
Their innovative technology is now able to exploit ultra-deep geothermal energy and could give us access to a permanent supply of renewable heating, cooling and power, provided anywhere, as well as providing a future-proof transition for skilled oil and gas workers, as existing infrastructure can be easily used. Their plasma driller leads to reducing drilling costs for geothermal projects, allowing the energy price to remain competitive even at deep depth.
https://www.academia.edu/20486796/Water_and_Climate_Change?email_work_card=title
All we do is run off looking to generate questionably new clean energy sources. Would be some day in dreamland when human western societies started to cut back on energy production. use less, create less, do with less. There is NO substitution for less,it's more stupid, more of a future on this planet and its children, more spendingt ime away from the Screaming Screens. This geothermal has potential for some good and plenty of potential for some bad effects on the climate. anything drilling into or near drinking water aquifers is a mistake. The planet already has a fresh water issue.