3 Comments

Daly here!

Since this went out, Global Water Intelligence has put out an excellent and thorough report synthesizing the GHG footprint of global water and wastewater, based on the latest IPCC emission factors. https://www.globalwaterintel.com/water-without-carbon

However, it's likely that IPCC emission factors are still underestimating the impact of methane and nitrous oxide, based on research from the past 2 years: https://engineering.princeton.edu/news/2023/02/28/wastewater-sector-emits-nearly-twice-much-methane-previously-thought

Finally I made a mistake the number here for current energy-related emissions. It should be closer to 0.3 GT than 0.6 GT, and the savings possible from "quick wins" closer to 0.2 GT than 0.4 GT.

Expand full comment

How does greywater or septic systems fit in this model? Both of these system treat the water locally and require little to no electricity.

Expand full comment

Hi MK! Check out p. 6 of this report for an estimate of the emissions from septic tanks. They don't require power, but do generate a significant amount of methane. https://www.linkedin.com/smart-links/AQHmZ6jDIUNpDA/95cdbd90-e436-4f8b-b1bb-e1cb9d917498

Modern composting toilets can often be more sustainable than septic tanks, but there's still a lot of debate on how best to design "on-site" sanitation systems.

Greywater would fall under the category of "recycled water", which is absolutely beneficial although it's hard to quantify the exact GHG benefit, since it depends on which water source it is replacing.

Expand full comment